| Subject: Re: seti runs better on win or linux |
| From: raj@rijhwani.org (Raj Rijhwani) |
| Date: 24/09/2003, 05:53 |
| Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti |
On Tuesday, in article
<fR2cb.23812$dk4.758789@typhoon.sonic.net> rrschulz@cris.com
"Randall R Schulz" wrote:
Absent information about the machines' caches and memory bus speeds
and widths and the kind of DRAM installed, you categorical statement
of which would process SETI@home work units faster is not justified.
Occams razor and reasonable assumptions inferred from the given
information. Usual caveats apply.