-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 08:11:03 GMT, Neo Geshel <gotcha@geshel.org> wrote:

So my question is this -- has anyone had an opportunity to try out SETI 
on an Opteron system, and how much of a performance increase did they 
see in comparison to an Athlon XP processor of comparable speed?

Unless they've released an x86-64-Windoze version of S@H recently, 
you're actually going to see a reduction in speed, according to the 
benchmarks I've seen.

Aparently, the way S@H works, the 32-bit stuff in the Hammer doesn't do 
the job for it as well as the Athlon XPs do.

But, I would hope the S@H folks think about releasing a Windoze 64-bit 
version sometime in the near future.  :-)

-- 
Rob                                |  If not safe,
Email and Jabber:                  |    one can never be free.
     athlonrob at axpr dot net     |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/dc5xhm6KEoOOAe0RAlrWAKCf+VCRmcwUq3sR08jkMeofvnsJKACfWsKh
kPutQ4r75A3rG2uJRy2C4jA=
=H+kp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----