AthlonRob wrote:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 21:51:10 -0500, AthlonRob <athlonrob@nodomainhere.ext> wrote:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:37:25 -0700, AthlonRob <athlonrob@nodomainhere.ext>
wrote:

<snip>

Hey, dumbshit... you think you're really fooling folks?

This is a prime example why I like using GPG to sign my posts.

Hell, you aren't even in the same timezone as I am.

Your message ID ain't even *close*, and Forte agent?  c'mon, ya little 
puss.

For those who are clueless up to this point, the post I'm responding to 
is using a forged FROM and REPLY-TO headers.  I didn't make that post, 
as you can guess by the lack of a PGP signature.

I see you have been borged ;o)

The following quote started that message:

I'm not sure on the Return-Paths - I've asked a few folks and none of 
them have had a real answer as to their real-ness.  Since nobody has 
told me (or complained to me) they are forged, I'm going on the 
assumption that the Return-Path header is legitimate, and as such, 
haven't blocked my mailserver from sending out warnings to those 
addresses.

yeah, what he said... wait, what I said... wait, am I really myself?

The headers show:
From: AthlonRob <athlonrob@nodomainhere.ext>
Sender: AthlonRob <athlonrob@nodomainhere.ext>
Reply-To: AthlonRob <athlonrob@nodomainhere.ext>
Honestly, I was too lazy to hack into the agent to add the Return-Path ;o)

Calm down Rob ;o) it was just to show that any address could be forged.

-- 
Robi "btw that's a nick for Robert"