-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 03:38:20 +0100 (BST), Raj Rijhwani <raj@rijhwani.org> wrote:

On Wednesday, in article
     <8a14nvkkf6tvshr5lmpdati89ccno5l45o@4ax.com>
     an89765478@anon.penet.de "me" wrote:

Do you think it just be because you use a REAL email adress?!!!

Heaven forfend that someone should actually follow specified protocol 
and post with complete and legitimate addresses.

Which RFC is that?

It should be ammended, I think.  With the ease at which email addresses 
can be harvested if they're in the FROM header, for spam or worms... I 
don't think it's really that bad to use a fake address in there.

I do think folks should make it easy to respond to a post via email, 
though.  (see my sig for my example)

-- 
Rob                                |  If not safe,
Email and Jabber:                  |    one can never be free.
     athlonrob at axpr dot net     |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/dRxlhm6KEoOOAe0RAv+UAKC6IHv/Ytv2oCGRuITE3/m7HZCjMQCdGJs5
4H9w8mTlA7UGm63ZEDNflS0=
=PJx3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----