Subject: Re: seti runs better on win or linux
From: AthlonRob
Date: 10/10/2003, 05:33
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 03:35:52 GMT, Reason <pj@hotmail.com> wrote:
If Linux had viruses, we would ever know, because Linux-heads would refuse
to acknowledge their existence.

What the hell are you talking about?

The way Linux runs, a regular user contracting a virus can't damage the 
whole system.

If there was a security exploit in something allowing somebody to do 
something they aren't allowed to do, anybody interested easily finds out 
as it makes the tech news circuit pretty darned fast.

Linux heads not acknowledging existence of Linux viruses... heh...

-- Rob | If not safe, Email and Jabber: | one can never be free. athlonrob at axpr dot net | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/hja1hm6KEoOOAe0RAguxAJ4m7z58CEKYHgj+NHTGoQvFWKEWsACcCP/5 s9wK3GAkq8SxD/c3xg5jnxo= =uieY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----