| Subject: Re: Seti 3.08 conflicts with Outlook 2002 |
| From: "Michael D. Ober" <obermd-.@.-alum-mit-edu-nospam> |
| Date: 04/11/2003, 14:06 |
Microsoft, in their infinite wisdom, made the off-line folders
syncronization in Outlook and Windows XP a processor priority 1 thread, the
lowest possible. This by itself isn't so bad, but MS also made this feature
a critical path for the user interface in these products. Turn off-line
folders off.
Mike.
"Brian Cleverly" <Brian.cleverly@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:3FA621A1.A49E22F6@btinternet.com...
my seti program has been chugging away on my Laptops for a few tears now
quite happily from one Pc upgrade to another. however I have found that
with outlook 2002, when the client does a synchronisation with the
server, it takes hours if seti is still running. If I take seti off,
then it's minutes. i notice on the Task manager that Seti has 99% of the
resources, but it does seem to release them when I use other programs.
BTW I have Seti on all the time. The laptop runs w2000 pro, has 256Mb
RAM & a P4 1.4G processor. as above, I only have issues when Outlook is
synchronising, any ideas?