| Subject: Postulate Revisited...... |
| From: "Paul R. Mays" <uce@ftc.gov> |
| Date: 05/11/2003, 05:28 |
| Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,alt.sci.seti |
I thought it about time I again wrote of my postulate
and fan the flames. First I will start off this muse with
some background noise so that first time reader of my prose
understands my starting positions and rational for my posting
in the first place...
First who am I... Nobody in particular...
I'm a medically retired Ex-Army service connected disabled
white American male of 48 years of age. I have spent
the last 27 years of my life working or studying ( can be
the same thing) in electronics and Electromachanical
service, management and design. Have a B.S. in
Electroachanical Engineering and eng ratings certifications
from many companies when I have taken specific product
training and certification.
Http://Paul.Mays.Com/resume.htm
Have owned my own company (Perpetual Power Service
Company [ has nothing to do with perpetual anything just
was a catchy name] where I designed and marketed large
scale emergency power systems and all battery plants
, motor/gen sets, inverter arrays, transfer switching and
data interconnects inclusive within the systems ) ... I also
worked as a field engineer as a senior field eng. rep. for
Seimens, General Power Systems, Deltec, Best Power,
American Power and several other backup systems producers.
About 10 years ago I changed fields to automation systems
design and worked with several companies either running build
crews or designing sub systems for large automated
manufacturing systems. I would make a guess that 90% of
the population of the lower 48 states have used a service
or product that has my hand in its coming to fruition.
About 3 years ago an old army injury ( specifically... I worked
as a missile tech on hawk and Nike systems and we had a
hawk detonate 200 foot off the rack and caused a very bad
day for all... but an absolutely amazing observation advantage, I
recall every detail of blast wave effect and approach) started to
reoccur ( systemic neuropathy of lacerated tissues) causing
the army to put me on the dole and telling me to hang out with
you guy more often.
So I started a company to make web pages and keep me using my
hands in a way that if I screw up, somebody don't get kilt.
( consider dropping a 9/16th on a 3,400ah 550vdc battery rack)
And spend time here musing on the state of the human mind....
All that to just say howdy....
To the meat...
I am not a mathematician, I am not a physicist, I am not
a poster of theory... I have not the background nor
data to rise to that level... But I am a scientist and I have
studied the rules (read Laws) of physics as we knew them
and as we know them now. I see no reason for dealing with
mathematical constructs in my concepts for they are not
theory. They are musings, postulations, conjecture and
the occasional assumption. I post for no other reasons
(on any subject) other than entertainment, therapeutic
and educational (mine) value.
So Mays Absurd Postulate forms from the mist....
In The Beginning....
To understand the foundation for this postulate some have
called a "Quack Theory of Everything" I must try to
describe the Singularity of the BB before anything that
follows. And in doing so I will postulate on the causation
mechanism for the yet to be defined elements of gravitational
and magnetic variance.
We consider that the yet to be defined energy form that was
the source of the BB was following Einsteinian conversion
then looking at the reverse condition may explain a bit better.
If I have a finite amount of matter and I convert it into an energy
form we observe the energy forms (kinetic, thermal, inertial,)
and are controlled by relativistic force forms ( EM,G,WN&SN)
If we consider the matter without relation to external matter and
convert the matter to energy without reference to external matter
(as is the case of a BB singularity) you have a unified yet to be
defined energy form that seems to have a infinite energy density
but was converted from a finite amount of matter.
In the case of a hypothesized Singularity ( I have a postulate I've posted
before on the view of the Singularity as a Quantum Point of finite
energy potential in base state of ciaos but its generally given the
plonk treatment from the outset) it cannot be defined by any existing
rules at this point and the laws of physics break down causing the
mathematically created illusion of infinite.
This was the Quantum Point of the BB ( I consider QP [Quantum Point]
as a better descriptor for my postulate for several reasons, it better
relays
the concept after time 0+ , better explains the relationships of matter in
both micro and macro regions, better expresses base form of nature. )
The QP (Chaos Point, Singularity) was a finite amount of unified energy
of a yet to be defined nature. It would have been governed by only
two rule's that we can identify and that is probability and uncertainty.
Without matter all other laws fail... No mathematical construct can be
applied using the rules we today know... Not that there are not rules
that apply, only that existing rules cannot.
So I propose that the QP had the probability of converting a finite
amount of matter in the form of matter/anti matter base particles
of a finite size or not. And that the converted matter due to
uncertainties of conversion may tend to be of any finite amount
and in a finite ratio of matter to antimatter. This view of energy
conversion is fully in holding with Einsteinian conversion theory.
The only consideration is in considering the conversion in
the absence of related other matter external of the local event.
So I posit that the QP existed ( may be a multitude of QP in a
multitude of conversion conditions existing without dimensional
properties that apply from our set of rules in this Universe)
From this QP a finite amount of matter and a finite amount
of antimatter was converted ( a tad bit more matter than
antimatter).
At time 0+ the matter and antimatter annihilated each other
converting the matter and antimatter into energy and since
we now have the left over matter we can model the conversion
using rules that apply to matter in relation to other matter in
motion. This period of annihilation was the inflationary period
that is well written of. The energy was imparted into the base
particles left over, and makes up all matter in the universe
today. This imparted energy maintains the expansion that
followed the inflation with the imparted kinetic applied and
set the particles to ringing, this ringing is the EM signature
of each particle.
At this point I must define my "Particle" as opposed to
"point particles"," Virtual Particles" and other surnames...
My SPP ( Smallest Physical Particle) is a real physical
ball of stuff (very small) that produces a EM wave of a
variable frequency with variable rate of decay of the
frequency and amplitude of the wave. I think it is
detectable and experimentally verifiable but not
with the technology and rules we have in use today.
I consider the string theories to be on the right track
but have yet to consider the bias of considering a
concept while imbedded in the construct in question.
Consider the wave nature of a String as theorized
and then consider it a slice of a EM wave propagating
from a EM producing SPP. If a variation of the
view is applied to the String theory we see that variation as
another String at angle to out first construct and
have a new dimension to contend with. So I contend
that string theory describes the radiating EM fields
of the base SPP and equates out as a slice in the
field at a specific distance of the radiating SPP.
The uncertain nature of the wave is due to the "Medium"
the wave propagates through and other EM producing
SPP's.
The "Medium" that I consider is not the medium of Maxwell's
Aether its a bit different and needs a bit of explanation.
After time 0+ there was a finite amount of matter converted
from the QP but it was not a 100% conversion. Probability
tells us it could have been a <.00000001% to a > 99.999999%
conversion so we have a remainder of the QP that did not
convert its unified yet to be defined energy form into matter
or anti-matter.
I contend that the Quantum Point of the BB still exists as a
Quantum State between all SPP's. Its properties are that it
produces a inverse tensor (elastic mode variable) between
all SPP's. Each SPP produces a EM wave and those EM wave
mix, heterodyne, cancel out producing a composite EM signature
for each local grouping of SPP's. Due to the complexities and
uncertainty of the mixings end composite it tends to be a
probabilistic state. Locally when two or more SPP's are brought
in proximity they increase in tensor value in relation to
local other SPP's but dependent of the interplay of the EM waves
some will be attracted and some repelled and will tend to form
structure as harmonic nodes form in the EM interplays.
The crux of the problem is the position of the observer in
relation to the observed. Since the reader, writer and all
known methods to observe exist as conglomerates of SPP's
it contains intrinsic bias. We observe by detecting or producing
EM waves and sampling the wave at specific intervals of time.
Since we are connected to the observed by the Quantum State
our act of observing impacts the observed and the observed
impacts the design and method of observing.
As An Example I propose this:
A ----------------------B----C--O--D------E-----------------------Z
A= Furthest SPP in some direction
B= Furthest SPP in some direction relative to local SPP's
C= Closest SPP in some direction relative to local Observer
O= Observer
D= Closest SPP in some direction relative to local Observer
E= Furthest SPP in some direction relative to local SPP's
Z= Furthest SPP in some other direction
--------- = Quantum State
A ----------------------B----C--O--D------E-----------------------Z
<--
If A moves the total value of QS varies art the rate of
movement. This is detectable as a variation in the UGC
(Universal Gravitational Constant, Cosmological Constant)
which would reduce as A and all other particle are separated
buy implied kinetic energy. Locally the observer would note
the variance on a much lesser scale as it would be locally
mediated by local SPP's. If this rate occurs on a
universal scale the observer would consider the value a
constant in that its variance would not be detectable within
the life span of the solar system if we consider the expansion
on a universal scale. This also predicts that the rate of
expansion will increase as the universe expands.
A ----------------------B----C--O--D------E-----------------------Z
<--
Now we move D ... the value of the QS is increased
between the observe and the QS value is decreased
between D and E. the UGC remains intact but locally
the value between D,O and C also vary . This separation
distance between SPP's set the local value of all locally
considered SPP's and gives rise to the illusion of curved
space. Since we have yet to define the nature of this
Quantum State (QS), or even all the rules that apply to it,
we model it and the calculation leads to an illusion of
curvature due to the missing construct.
Since we exist within the QS with every particle of our
existence connected to every other we look for observations
and detect the EM waves of groupings of SPP's and due to
our interconnection the EM wave may be observed and
modeled as a "particle" when examined physically or
empirically for a short duration of time, a time that is
short enough to fall below our ability to measure. This
intrinsic bias gives rise to "virtual" particles and any
particle that produces the observable aspect of duality.
And also give rise to the constructs of infinity.
So my own view is that infinity is just illusionary....
An illusion that occurs when the existing rules fail
due to scale or missing rules of causation.
I actually think QM is getting closest to the true nature
of the issue it still not advanced to the point of unification
and that's the issue when speaking of Quantum points
( Ciaos Point [Williams] , singularity)...
The whole of the universe is expanding at an
ever increasing rate as it expands... and the
best rational is that the mechanism that
displays as an effect gravity is the Quantum,
yet to be defined , energy that is the remainder
of the finite energy that produced by conversion
all the matter in our universe. That Quantum
State exist as a inverse tensor field (elastic
mode variance) where as the field strength
reduces with separation distance of bound
physical particles. As the universe expands
from the conversion of matter and anti- matter
into heat and kinetic during the inflation period
the field between all particles
is reduced causing the UGC ( universal gravitational
constant ) to reduce... this causes a lower UGC on a
universal scale and the universe increases its rate
of expansion...
Consider the old view of a Universal Balloon..
if you were at outside edge or close to it because it has no edge
like a balloon ( think of it as a balloon with the skin on the inside...
each particle connected to each other particle with the skin.. as
the particles move apart the strength of the connect is maintained
no matter the distance but its value is reduced between any particles)
The UGC is set by the overall separation of all matter so the baseline
Gravitational field is not constant but varies at a rate set by the
total separation of all matter so on our scale it would appear
as a constant due to it not varying in any degree that could be
measured on our scale..... But locally if the matter is dense the
local gravitational set is varied.. this causes the gravitational wells
of massive objects. The baseline gravitational field is an effect aspect
of separation distance of particles.
I truly think there are no constants or infinities in the universe.
We call a mathematical construct a constant because we cannot
ever note a change in it.. But if it changes on a universal scale
we would never be able to note it as a variable,,, and I submit
that the concept of infinity is but a illusion that occurs when
known mathematical laws break down.
As an example.. try this thought experiment.. you have a finite
amount of matter.. consider it the only matter in the universe..
Einsteinian rules say It can be converted into energy and energy
can be converted into matter.. If its the only matter and you
convert it into energy you cannot get kinetic form because
there is no other matter to impart to.. you cannot get thermal
because thermal conversion must occur to other matter also..
What you would end up with would be unified energy without
any matter for effect physical laws to apply. Now try as
you like, if you wish to calculate the energy quanta of this
conversion you end up with infinite energy.. because all
physical laws we know are only applicable to matter in motion...
and break down if you try to know the energy quanta ...you
end up with the illusion of infinite energy even though
you know that it was converted from a finite amount of matter..
And I now postulate another kook concept....
The value of c is variable and is set by separation distance
of true Physical particles but the rate of variance of the
base value is set by total separation distance of all
particles on a universal scale and will not vary in the
life span of our solar system. But will vary locally
in closely grouped particle fields. I postulate that this
is the reason for the velocity of EM waves to reduce
while traversing a medium.
The theory of velocity being reduced by absorbs and
retransmission was only conceived because of the bias
that c was constant and a mathematical rational had to
be formed that explained why the measured value of c
was reduced in a medium. If you apply the same
formula to the concept and consider that the value
of c is less between particles you end up with the same
end results as the absorbs and retransmission
model....
Using this postulate I make a few predictions
1. The Rate of Expansion will increase as the Universe expands.
2. The UGC or CC will vary at the rate of expansion.
3. The Value of C in a vacuum will vary at the rate of expansion.
4. The Value of C will vary in a local close grouping of Particles
( Medium)
5. The Value of G will vary locally with separation distance
of local matter.
6. All particles that display the aspect of duality are only
EM waves sampled in a short time frame by a method
and design that is intrinsically biased.
7. The concepts of infinity and paradox are illusions created
when existing rules fail due to scale or incompleteness.
8. Gravity is the effect of varying the separation distance of
SPP's ( Smallest Physical Particle)
9. Magnetism is the effect of EM waves through natural selection
forming a heterodyned interplay that is detectable as the
attractive force.
10. the WN and SN forces are effects aspects of short range
EM interplays finding equilibrium as SPP's group.
And have as an experiment to show the effect is the Brown effect
of applied static field which Tesla considered in his 1937 static
motion demonstration.
Here's a working variation to demonstrate the effect of altering
the local QS by applied static charge....
http://ripkaboroski.com/device5b.jpg
In closing let me repeat... This is not a theory...
I have not the Mathematical ability to provide
models that can be examined but I do think
the model can be created and verified. For the
most part I see no point where I disagree with the
existing standard models and all existing math
remains intact for the most part. My Postulate
explains many of the issues that have plagued
physics for ever while maintaining that for the
most part all existing physical laws are correct and
viable. My postulate also address's the Zero Point
Energy theories that float about and fills in the
problems that exist in that area. It follows String
Theory to a great deal but gives predictions and
asserts that there is no need for more than 4 dim
to define any point in the universe. The postulate
explains the Brown Effect which has yet to be defined
to a point the definition in agreement with GR or SR.
I look for anyone to debate my view in detail
and destroy it by showing me where I deviate
from the existing theory to a point my postulate fails.
Feel free to ask any question on any aspect not understood
and I will gladly explain my concept of the details mentioned.
I cannot prove my postulate so don't ask for proof but I can
explain the construct and how it fits the existing observation
of the reality around us. There is many aspects I do not
fully grasp so there of course will be holes in the postulate
and that's why I'm here looking for intelligent people
to point out the holes and poke new ones so I can better
express the postulate.
