| Subject: Re: Postulate Revisited...... |
| From: My Name |
| Date: 05/11/2003, 19:12 |
| Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,alt.sci.seti |
Paul R. Mays wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:3FA9151B.E93331FF@hate.spam.net...
"Paul R. Mays" wrote:
I thought it about time I again wrote of my postulate
and fan the flames.
[snip]
Idiot. Anybody who needs 834 lines to say something has nothing
to say.
A Hollywood presentation starts with one (1) sentence. If you
cannot grab Management in 25 words or fewer you are out the door.
You obviously have no idea, concept, or overall view of your
spew, All you do is dry heave without end.
Go kiss a bush somewhere else.
If I cared to "grab" management I would have taken a
different tack. I post only a postulate that I have
presented in short less than 25 word chunks for some
time. This was but a fill for those that pick up on the
small chunks and wish to see a bit more detail of my
mad ranting which you ( and I do actually hold your
intellectual abilities in high regards) to date have never
explained where my postulate disagrees with the standard
models on a conceptual and simple level which, by
your post, seems what you wish for...
And you post this "postulate" in a seti group now for what reason?
If you had previously presented your other 'chunks' in this forum,
your explanation may mave been more acceptable. It now looks like it
is just spam for your web page and CV.
mn