| Subject: Re: Variations in processing speed of WU's??? |
| From: "Martin G. Diehl" <mdiehl@nac.net> |
| Date: 06/11/2003, 06:46 |
Ravenmadtaoist wrote:
** chuckles ** Yes, yes... I know windoze ZZZ zzz ZZZ..
Unfortunately most of the toys I like to play with
only run on it!
Thank you for your response. I do have SETIspy, checked
out what you suggested and it certainly makes sense
though I admit I still have quite a bit to learn about
it all.
Thank you for your time, it is truely appreciated!
Happy to help.
Sincerely
Ravenmadtaoist
PS: Love the sig!
Thanks.
Do you mean Reality? <g>
"Martin G. Diehl" <mdiehl@nac.net> wrote in message
news:<3FA7A14A.DFDD761B@nac.net>...
Yes, angle range causes a big variation in processing
time ... however, that is also influenced by OS.
Linux is affected much less than Windoze. There may
be other coding in the WU's that affects processing
time. If you use SETIspy (What! you're not <g>), you
may notice that the number of FFTs varies. At least,
that is what I remember ... but can't verify that at
this time.
[snip]
--
Martin G. Diehl
Reality -- That which remains after you stop thinking
about it.
All replies and comments accepted and considered.
Adoption of your suggestions are at my sole discretion.
Award criteria are unpublished and are considered to
be a trade secret. As such, awards for your responses
cannot be guaranteed. Incoming flames may be stored
for use during severe winters or may be circulated for
deep analysis, peer review, and/or literary criticism.