Subject: Re: Variations in processing speed of WU's???
From: "Martin G. Diehl" <mdiehl@nac.net>
Date: 06/11/2003, 06:46
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti

Ravenmadtaoist wrote:

** chuckles **  Yes, yes... I know windoze ZZZ zzz ZZZ.. 
Unfortunately most of the toys I like to play with 
only run on it!

Thank you for your response.  I do have SETIspy, checked 
out what you suggested and it certainly makes sense 
though I admit I still have quite a bit to learn about 
it all.

Thank you for your time, it is truely appreciated!

Happy to help.  

Sincerely
Ravenmadtaoist

PS:  Love the sig!

Thanks.  

Do you mean Reality?  <g>

"Martin G. Diehl" <mdiehl@nac.net> wrote in message 
news:<3FA7A14A.DFDD761B@nac.net>...

Yes, angle range causes a big variation in processing 
time ... however, that is also influenced by OS.  
Linux is affected much less than Windoze.  There may 
be other coding in the WU's that affects processing 
time.  If you use SETIspy (What! you're not <g>), you 
may notice that the number of FFTs varies.  At least, 
that is what I remember ... but can't verify that at 
this time.

[snip]

-- Martin G. Diehl Reality -- That which remains after you stop thinking about it. All replies and comments accepted and considered. Adoption of your suggestions are at my sole discretion. Award criteria are unpublished and are considered to be a trade secret. As such, awards for your responses cannot be guaranteed. Incoming flames may be stored for use during severe winters or may be circulated for deep analysis, peer review, and/or literary criticism.