On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 03:57:12 GMT, Sowulo <bosco@UFO.com> wrote:
: *snip*
: 
: Gee, that's funny......you didn't address any of my
: criticisms.......guess you'd rather just hijack the topic with a bunch

Gee, that's funny ... I didn't see you quoted you anywhere in my
previous post.  Perhaps that's because I wasn't responding to you.

And the original topic WAS the assertion by Twisted Hardware that a
hyperthreaded processor would only be 50% utilized by a single task,
and therefore that you needed to process two work units in order to
get 100% utilization.

That WAS baloney, that REMAINS baloney, and that was my only assertion.
I supported it with two citations -- one of them from Intel.

Now who is it that is doing the hijacking again?