| Subject: Re: Question on setting up a farm |
| From: f/fgeorge |
| Date: 12/11/2003, 20:29 |
He put in a slash after "mywebpages", remove it and the link works
I clicked it, let it time out, and then removed the slash and the page
worked
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:28:10 -0600, Ted Nelson
<tnelsons@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote:
Please put up a link that works. Sounds like it might be interesting
STZ wrote:
Hi,
I am running currently 16 minimal processors (1.3GHz CPU, 64
megRAM,diskless). I prefer win95 server based. I doubt if you could
run any other windoz OS with only 64 Meg and still have room for a
ramdisk.
If you would like to take a look, goto
http:\\mywebpages\.comcast.net\stevezinn\seti_main.htm
On Sun, 18 May 2003 06:26:28 GMT, "rcm" <rcm711@hotmail.com> wrote:
I am interested in setting up a very very small SETI farm. 2-4 PCs, PII 450
to PIII800. My main PC is running Win 98 SE with SetiSpy, SetiDriver and
CLI 3.03. I have another running the same right now.
I am interested in running an efficient farm. How do I set it up. The PC's
will run a minimum setup, 1 gb hard drive, floppy, 1-2 mb video card, 10 mbs
NIC, 64 or 128 mb RAM. I have a 4 port KVM switch to share the keyboard,
monitor and mouse. I have all these parts and PCs are tested and up and
ready to run. I will tweak each machine hardware wise after I get them up
and running SETI.
I know the electrical power consumption will make getting a AMD 2 gHz
machine look more efficient but I just want to mess around with this.
My question is what is the most efficient OS to use. I have Win 95 B and
Win 98 SE legal copies (well not legal to multi install but ...) Not
interested in Win 2k or XP as the machines I plan to use with run SETI only.
I don't have the hardware anyway to run them.
Should I go Linux? I don't know Linux at all. Is there a simple Linux to
install to just run SETI efficiently?
Any web sites to hand hold me through Linux running SETI?