Subject: Re: Linux - 100,000,000 Seti@home Work Units
From: gary.smith@primeexalia.com (Gary Smith)
Date: 04/12/2003, 05:40
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti,comp.os.linux.misc

steve <steve@wenowut.org> wrote in message news:<QSCyb.10700$ws.994793@news02.tsnz.net>...
linux-gnu and linux-gnu-static, have, together reached a total just over
100,000,000 work units in aid of Seti@Home

http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/oss.html

     OS                    WUs      CPU Total        CPU avg / WU

1) Windows NT: 5.0      287652487 335305.947 years 10 hr 12 min 40.3 sec
2) Windows NT: 5.1      217683971 191455.627 years 7 hr 42 min 16.2 sec
3) Windows 95: 4.10     193166923 437479.709 years 19 hr 50 min 21.9 sec
4) Windows NT: 4.0      134848586 233462.043 years 15 hr 09 min 57.9 sec
5) linux-gnu            80119267  85571.747 years  9 hr 21 min 22.1 sec
6) Macintosh OS         52769068  109191.227 years 18 hr 07 min 35.1 sec
7) Windows 98: 4.90     39332710  70152.948 years  15 hr 37 min 26.9 sec
8) Windows 95: 4.0      24587154  92525.551 years  32 hr 57 min 55.2 sec
9) linux-gnulibc1       18900527  28774.351 years  13 hr 20 min 10.7 sec

It's catching up but it isn't faster at this point.  The time that it
takes for Windows is still less tht Linux according to the numbers. 
Maybe it's because it takes more CPU to run Windows (but then it sits
idle more after it's started).

			Units	  CPU Years	CPU Years 	Units per 
						per Unit	CPU Year
1) Windows NT: 5.0	287652487 335305.947	0.001165663	857.8806597
2) Windows NT: 5.1	217683971 191455.627	0.000879512	1136.994375
3) Windows 95: 4.10	193166923 437479.709	0.002264775	441.544874
4) Windows NT: 4.0	134848586 233462.043	0.00173129	577.6038977
5) linux-gnu		80119267  85571.747	0.001068055	936.281773
6) Macintosh OS		52769068  109191.227	0.002069228	483.272049
7) Windows 98: 4.90	39332710  70152.948	0.001783578	560.670807
8) Windows 95: 4.0	24587154  92525.551	0.003763166	265.7336674
9) linux-gnulibc1	18900527  28774.351	0.00152241	656.8532858	
I have seti running on (2) P4 2.4ghz, (2) AMD 1700+ and (6) P3 450mhz
and a fried has it running on some similar hardware and I tend to beat
him by about 5% on average unless I'm playing warcraft in which case
it slows considerably :) but I leave it running anyways.

The good news is that we see a lot more people running Linux...

:)