| Subject: Re: SETI@home receives only 50% CPU time? |
| From: "sweet" <sweet430@hotmail.com> |
| Date: 16/12/2003, 04:03 |
"Stratcat�" <none@no.org> wrote in message
news:bfpDb.12434$aw2.6552632@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
"sweet" <sweet430@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9DnDb.422680$pT1.27942@twister.nyc.rr.com...
Hi,
I have been running SETI@home for a few years now and only since I
installed
Windows XP Pro have I been able to see the amount of process time the
application receives. It's only 50% and the other 50% is "System Idle
Processes."
What gives??
One scenario would be: You're running a single instance of the Seti client
on a HyperThreaded enabled cpu.
Bingo.
If that's the case, your single client will run nearly identical WU times
with or w/o HT enabled.
I would have thought that HT was "time-sharing" (remember that? :) built
into
a PC's CPU. So it seemed very wrong for my machine to be splitting it's time
between idle and sah.
If you run two CLI clients w/a HT system you will see your WU times
increase
by ~40 - 50%, but will process 2 units in that time period, for an
aggregate
increase in production of ~50% for your machine
Sweet. I'll look into it.
- - - cut - - -
If you're currently using the GUI client & change to CLI's, your increase
will be
even more substantial. If you're running a single instance of CLI 3.08 &
convert to CLI 3.03(s), you will see an additional ~ 10 -15% increase in
production vs. the CLI 3.08's
Even sweeter.
If you have a reasonably quick HT machine [2.6G+], & a decent graphics
card, you can easily run two CLI's, & still use your machine for moderate
general use w/o too heavy of a performance hit.
My Specs:
-----------
Windows XP Pro
MB: ASUS P4P800 - 800 FSB
CPU: Intel P4 3.00 GHz - 800 FSB
GC: ASUS Radeon 9600XT
RAM: Twin Corsair 512MB = 1 GB Dual channel DDR 400
HD: 2x80 GB configured as RAID0 160GB HD
PWR: Enermax 460W
CASE: Lian-Li PC-61
It takes about 3 hrs. to finish a wu - compared to my old machine which took
about 16 hrs (PIII/450).
Thanks for the tips about CLI's and 3.08 vs. 3.03.
-sweet
_________________________________
sweet 430 at hot mail dot com
http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/jbc33/