| Subject: SUMMARY (To All in This Thread) |
| From: "sweet" <sweet430@hotmail.com> |
| Date: 17/12/2003, 12:52 |
"John" <fredclark@consltec.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:EIfl5IE2Xz3$Ewsk@consltec.demon.co.uk...
In article <XsCDb.217961$Gq.28260275@twister.nyc.rr.com>, sweet
<sweet430@hotmail.com> writes
1) There are no CLI's for WinXP (Pro).
2) I am running the gui, but only minimized. I maximize it only to take a
peak at it's progress.
-sweet
Funny - I run 4 CLIs.
The version is the 3.03 .1386-winnt-cmdline one, and has run steadily,
without intervention for several months using WinXP Pro. Under this OS
Task Manager shows 4 processors running at 100% each, or 25% each under
"processes".
I run these under a SETI Driver/Spy combo feeding to SETI Queue, as my
proxy, for my small farm.
--
John Clark
Thanks to all in this thread. I dl'd the driver and ran it and the CLI for
the first
time last night (~12Mdnt). I also had the gui client running. I checked the
Task
Manager and sure enough, 2 seti processes were listed each receiving 50% of
cpu time. Ain't HT grand? :)
So this morning I thought I would awake to see my total crunch increased
from
2 to 4. Guess what?... the sah server was not connecting... :/
But still, all went very smoothly and I thought I would finish out this
thread with
a SUMMARY.
Thanks to all, you've been great!
May the One true Living Lord God Almighty richly bless you, in Jesus' name,
amen.
Sincerely,
joe
-sweet
_________________________________________________________
http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/jbc33/
PS: KONG: To clean out my registry I use a Japanese product called "Super
Rabbit Registry Optimizer." I have used it for ~4 years on my old PIII/450
Win98 machine, and just started using it on my (brand) new Win XT Pro
machine. My old machine seemed to run faster. This one is too fast for me
to notice a difference in performance... yet :)