| Subject: Re: Command line v. Screensaver |
| From: "Gonzo" <james@FUCKSPAMFUCKzerblattzoo.co.uk> |
| Date: 07/01/2004, 21:51 |
| Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti |
yes it is. i installed it on my linux machines having a partition which they share with win98 just before xmas. there's approx a 20% improvement between the win98 screensaver and the unix cli version which knocks my network up to 15 units per day roughly. 10% of that is o/s and the rest is the cli version so you should see an improvement.-- cheers james "Terry Pratchett" <tpratchett@unseen.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:duRWJoYgfE$$EAty@unseen.demon.co.uk...I've been running the command line version on one machine for a day or two and it seem to me there's a 10% improvement in speed. Is that about right, please? -- Terry Pratchett