| Subject: Re: Command line v. Screensaver |
| From: Terry Pratchett |
| Date: 08/01/2004, 09:42 |
In message
<nb%Kb.1487$5%6.788@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net>, Gonzo
<james@FUCKSPAMFUCKzerblattzoo.co.uk> writes
yes it is. i installed it on my linux machines having a partition which they
share with win98 just before xmas. there's approx a 20% improvement between
the win98 screensaver and the unix cli version which knocks my network up to
15 units per day roughly. 10% of that is o/s and the rest is the cli version
so you should see an improvement.
Unfortunately the CLI version quarrels with WordPerfect (it says in the
small print somewhere) so I can install it on a couple of the powerful
machines only if I also run a little program that shuts SETI down when
WP is used -- which rather defeats the object.
--
Terry Pratchett