sweet wrote:
[...]

... So if they see fit for some wu's to be re-crunched then you can
bet your bottom dollar that they have a very good reason for it to be
done.

That is very sweet and trusting and may well be true. Note also that
there can be other reasons involved.

I'm no authority on this either and will continue to support SETI. However, at the moment my spare CPU cycles are working elsewhere where there is better feedback to say that they are being usefully utilised.


Happy crunchin'
Martin


See:
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/sstatus.html
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/wugraph.html
http://www.roving-mouse.com/setiathome/