| Subject: Re: Buffering units |
| From: Bob |
| Date: 23/01/2004, 00:08 |
Terry Pratchett wrote:
Well, SETIQueue is working fine, but as I found out tonight you're kind
of stuffed if that machine falls over. Seems to shame to lose that work
time.
Is there a buffering program that will work with SETIQueue, please? I'd
like to think that my high-turnover machines had a few units in hand to
last them until the next morning.
You could put seti driver on each machine or you could simply run a
machine that doesn't get used for much else as your Q.
I had a machine which ran SETI, SQ and acted as a basic fileserver. It
only ever went down due to power failure, and that wasn't a problem
because everything else went down as well..
Remember the machine running SQ doesn't need to be powerful, but it
should be running and NT / 2k based OS (Or Linux and wine)