| Subject: Re: Buffering units |
| From: "res0bg5g" <res0bg5g@verizon.net> |
| Date: 26/01/2004, 02:27 |
My two cents for SETIDriver as the best. I've had virtuallly no problems
with it. Used to run it with SETISpy but lately have dropped that except for
one machine. That is one great program. Thanks.
--Raven.
"Michael D. Ober" <obermd.@.alum.mit.edu.nospam> wrote in message
news:J40Qb.22612$1e.4559@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
I use SETI Driver on all of my machines (including the SETI Queue server)
and point them to a SETI Queue server. That way, if SETI Queue goes down
for any reason, my systems continue crunching.
Mike Ober.
http://www.wakeassoc.com/setidriver
"Terry Pratchett" <tpratchett@unseen.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:K$jDtQZFWFEAFA5F@unseen.demon.co.uk...
Well, SETIQueue is working fine, but as I found out tonight you're kind
of stuffed if that machine falls over. Seems to shame to lose that work
time.
Is there a buffering program that will work with SETIQueue, please? I'd
like to think that my high-turnover machines had a few units in hand to
last them until the next morning.
--
Terry Pratchett