| Subject: Re: Are SETI asumptions valid? (and does it matter if they aren't?) |
| From: marinedesign@juno.com (Guth/IEIS~GASA) |
| Date: 11/02/2004, 13:24 |
Another instalment upon Sirius/abc and of it's too-close-for-comfort
relationship to our solar system. OOPS, I forgot, that Sirius is
simply too close by and it's obviously too chuck full of interesting
issues for the likes of SETI, not to mention the photosynthises
interface with our solar system is simply to much for the likes of
SETI folks to think about. In other words "where's the money?".
Unlike most of the SETI huggers, I certainly do make my fair share of
mistakes but, never assume anything, as chances have become darn good
that I'm way more right than not, and if being even 1% correct about
the likes of evolution and/or of terraforming, or just about anything
having to do with our past, present and future is at least 99% more
right than most folks are willing to admit, especially by the
conditional morals of all the God and Jesus huggers. Don't get we
wrong, as I happen to like a terrific God as much as anyone, just not
of those Gods responsible for allowing the likes of Popes and of GW
Bush satan worshipers to get away with whatever they desire.
BTW; I've been asked to define moral wrongness, as I have in the past,
it's still in relationship to what's been before our eyes for decades,
namely the willful exclusion of folks situated all around us that
could have used a little fresh water, possibly even some clean food
and shelter, and of course an opportunity to contribute. Of course,
not having those big aircraft smashing into the tall building your in,
or of being those situated in flight-800 that's taking the unfortunate
time-slot of the intended Tel Aviv flight, and as for the
NASA/NSA/DoD/GW Bush way of accomplishing such warm and fuzzy good on
behalf of humanity, preferably without killing everybody first, would
obviously cost us a billion dollars per person, so why bother.
As to contiune along with the "Sirius wagging ruse" as I've been
informed;
This is just another one of my poor analogy examples of reverse
engineering, so if you don't get the notion nor the plot, you're not
alone nor are you a lost cause, just not nearly as smart as you
thought you were.
A typical galaxy zone is 99.9999999% empty, or at best 1e-9 chuck
full.
Anything of significance within a given galaxy that's situated less
than one light year (ly) apart is more than likely already rubbing
elbows. In other words, clearly capable of affecting one another, such
as between a large solar system that could be as far across as 1 ly or
as compact as 0.001 ly, of which this disk zone of dimensional worth
would essentially be considered occupied space, even though within
said solar system is perhaps, in of itself, occupying a mere 1e-6
portion of said disk zone.
None the less, if two such galaxies get within a single ly of one
another, essentially all hell should break lose. In fact 10 ly seems
way too close for comfort, and even 100 ly probably isn't going to
last forever, whereas a healthy 1000+ ly separation is, as far as
capable of sustaining life, good for go. Meaning that even if the
closing speed between two solar systems and/or significant stellar
contenders was of 0.001 ly/y (300 km/s), that gives inhabitants
initially separated by the 1000+ ly at least a million years worth of
betting their entire farms upon surviving the impending encounter.
Obviously at a closing speed of 30 km/s offers 10 million years prior
to whatever disaster, and as other qualified folks have pegged our SOA
through the Milkyway galaxy at 14 km/s and of towards the central zone
at 10 km/s, this assessment offers our chance at roughly 20 to 30
million years prior to encountering some other sizable solar system or
stellar confrontation.
What I'm referencing is to the likelihood of a certain stellar gravity
influencing upon our solar system, and namely the relatively compact
stellar influence of Sirius/abc, being the heavy weight contender and
of illuminating like a mega UV growth lamp that it is, that surely
it's been most capable of influencing our way of life, and even of the
most likely or best reason for the skewed orbit of Pluto, especially
if our mutual influence was ever within 0.01 ly.
Since none other is within our path nor of nearly the mass and
illumination as Sirius/abc, Sirius seems our most likely candidate, or
perhaps that of our lead star that has been our guiding light ever
since creation. As the association of our solar system and that of
Sirius has been significantly different than the vast body of other
significant substances with the Milkyway galaxy, and it seems clear
enough that the two of us have been passing through rather than part
of this surrounding galaxy, which certainly could be a good sort of
thing.
As long as the vast majority of other stuff is moving and/or expanding
away from the two of us rather than closing in. In other words, giving
the likes of Sirius and our solar system a little more breathing room
than some of the observed collision events which have brought galaxies
together and thereby solar systems into lethal conflict with one
another. So, we can thank our lucky stars that at least the one and
only star of concern for our solar system having been Sirius is
apparently a win-win situation, as even if there's a cycle upon every
110,000 years, if Sirius routinely coming within 0.01 ly, it's
obviously not been a death sense, just highly illuminating and sort of
a defrosting mode of nature that'll provide more worth towards a
renewed cycle of life, more than of exterminating it.
As things observed between interacting galaxies seem to represent a
great deal of happenstance (chaos on steroids), rather than by design,
as surely no halfwit decent creator would intentionally allow
trillions of nice folks to being exterminated just for the
sport/benefit of entertaining our astronomy folks, and/or giving us
the sorts of Hubble hugging computer wallpaper as opposed to
stabilizing the given situation. Of course the observed mass
annihilations of colliding galaxies is rather clearly suggesting that
perhaps all is not so divine nor contrived for the benefit of
humanity, as surely there's other life NOT as we know it, that which
has got to have become better evolved than our pathetic DNA/RNA has
managed, as I'd hate having to ponder the notion that any one of our
Gods we humans have worshiped has actually been more Taliban like than
not, though obviously the Roman Catholic God was certainly capable of
surpassing all recorded levels of carnage for the mere sport of it
all, which clearly indicates that at least their God has been the sort
capable of imploding a couple of galaxies without remorse.
Of course, if there's somewhat older inhabitance of places associated
with the likes of Sirius/abc, and if that group were ever to come to
within 0.01 ly of our solar system, seems like chances are good enough
that of well intentioned terraforming would have taken place, as for
all the right reasons of perchance escaping the rather obvious
complexities of life anywhere within the Sirius group, as the testy
Sirius environment seems at least good enough reason for myself to
consider upon moving over to what's considerably more stable and
viable, such as trying out the threesome of Mars, Earth and Venus as
having but one relatively stable sun, and as of a whole offering no
impending collisions on the horizon. As it seems entirely rational, if
we had such capability, and were out and about our galaxy looking for
an improvement upon what our Earth has to offer, that surely wee too
would be impressed if there were to be another viable world that
needed a little help getting things started, or perchance was sort of
ready to go as is, as it would certainly be hard to pass up such an
oasis, especially of our option of ever returning home simply wasn't
all that viable, as it may have been the case with certain groups from
the chaos of Sirius/abc.
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-sirius-trek.htm
Calling Venus;
If you're perchance interested in the hot prospect of achieving
interplanetary communications, as for that quest I've added lots into
this following page;
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-interplanetary.htm
BTW; There's still way more than a darn good chance of there being
other life of some sort existing on Venus:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Some good but difficult warlord readings: SADDAM HUSSEIN and The SAND
PIRATES
http://mittymax.com/Archive/0085-SaddamHusseinAndTheSandPirates.htm
David Sereda (loads of honest ideas and notions upon UV energy), for
best impact on this one, you'll really need to barrow his video:
http://www.ufonasa.com
The latest round of insults to this Mars/Moon/Venus class action
injury:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-what-if.htm
Some other recent file updates:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/moon-04.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-gwb-moon.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-illumination.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-moon-02.htm