In sci.skeptic, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com>
 wrote
on Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:08:08 +0930
<qbm190pulloomg6nqvkdj21hm66ght15hf@4ax.com>:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:30:20 +0800, "slh" <slh@com> wrote:

please go to......

http://www.bvalphaserver.com/article7845.html

Of course *every* government is interested in UFOs!
(Flying objects that are not yet identified.)
They might be enemy aircraft.
Now it *would* be surprising any air force were *not* interested in
unidentified aircraft intruding into their airspace.
In fact it would be a criminal dereliction of their very duty.

"The Air Force are interested in unidentified intruders."
Well, who would'a thort, eh Cuzzin Cletus?!

Indeed, I for one see UFOs routinely.  There are a fair
number of airports near where I live.... :-)

I doubt most of them are spaceworthy, though, although
those lucky enough to live near Kennedy Space Center might
see an occasional shuttle launch.  Not sure if I could see
a shuttle landing.  I think the shuttle might have passed
over my house (and a lot of other houses!) at one point,
and there wasn't much to see -- a silver sliver moving
fast -- but it's an interesting concept to think about
our astronauts up there.

Now if a space princess were to take an interest in me,
along with a red-headed female scientist, a piratess, a
couple of female policemen (one a complete ditz, the other
reasonably competent), and a youngster tagging along for
the ride (whose sister is she anyway?) and my granddad...oh,
wait, it's been done.

:-)

(Besides, I'd probably be the kid's dad by now anyway.  His
portrayal wasn't exactly the most flattering... :-) )

-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.