| Subject: Re: How smart are SETI@homers? - Scientific American |
| From: Louis Scheffer |
| Date: 03/05/2004, 07:53 |
| Newsgroups: sci.astro.seti,alt.sci.seti,sci.space.policy |
exosearch@juno.com (Jason H.) writes:
Here's a link to the article:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0009CDEA-33FC-1C74-9B81809EC588EF21
Some interesting quotes from this article:
Of course, we are still in the early days of SETI, and the lack
of success to date cannot be used to infer that ET civilizations
do not exist. The searches have so far covered only a small
fraction of the total "parameter space"--that is, the
combination of target stars, radio frequencies, power levels
and temporal coverage that observers must scan before drawing
a definitive conclusion.
and near the end:
In 1853 William Whewell, a prominent protagonist in the
extraterrestrial-life debate, observed, "The discussions
in which we are engaged belong to the very boundary regions
of science, to the frontier where knowledge ... ends and
ignorance begins." In spite of all the advances since Whewells
day, we are in basically the same position today. And the
only way to lessen our ignorance is to explore our cosmic
surroundings in greater detail.
That means we should continue the SETI programs until either
we detect signals or, more likely in my view, we can place
tight limits on the number of radio-transmitting civilizations
that may have escaped our attention.
Definitely not a 'SETI is futile' article, even though the author
does not expect it to succeed.
Lou Scheffer