Subject: Re: What is SETI? was->>Re: How smart are SETI@homers? - ScientificAmerican
From: Joseph Lazio
Date: 06/05/2004, 18:06
Newsgroups: sci.astro.seti,alt.sci.seti,sci.space.policy

[Regarding terrestrial radio transmissions:]

"R" == Rich  <someone@somewhere.com> writes:

R> In infinite wisdom David Woolley answered:
In article <40990158.7040305@somewhere.com>,

Planetary radar will tend to give false negatives at the
confirmation stage because it won't be repeatable.

R> While I agree with this, it's also not aimed at the stars. What are
R> the chances of it intercepting a star somewhere down the line? Who
R> knows. It does not seem highly likely.

The chances are quite high, actually.  The Arecibo beam is roughly a
few arcminutes in size.  Most of the targets (Venus, Mercury, Titan)
are no more than a few arcseconds in size.  Thus, most of the power
misses the target and keeps going.

-- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: jlazio@patriot.net No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html