"John" <fredclark@consltec.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:soXvxKAi$SqAFwtM@consltec.demon.co.uk...

In article <u_9qc.18537$0e6.14243@clgrps13>, Seti Cruncher
<SetiCruncher@?.com> writes

May 12th is a typo, the origional post was today, May 17th.  The site is
down as scheduled, but I would expect it to be down longer then the
scheduled two hours.

SC

Which seems to agree with my experience of 1 hour ago (22.30 hrs now in
the UK).

At least now I am getting web pages with an apology, unlike before.

The announcement for the 12th (today) is definitely a typo, and the
servers are still down.

I thank SETI Queue with it's reserve of 21 WUs. At least I can still
crunch until tomorrow. But about noon (UK) in will be out. I wonder how
many others are starting to look desperate for WUs, and how long most
can last without a fix of WUs? I will be in withdrawal tomorrow
afternoon.
-- 
John Clark

In the "reply to", replace either "fredclark" or "Workgroup" with
"jonclark" for direct e-mail.

I'm running two instances of SatH on a 3Gig Hyper-Threading machine. After
SatH has been down so many times, I'm going to cache much more than the 4 I
usually have.

Why don't they email all of us? This is not unreasonable b/c I know when
hotmail (MS) has an announcement about some offer, it goes to all of my
accounts... and they must have many more users than "just" 5 million.

Anyway, what's a good cache size? (I got plenty of space.) Say like ... 110?
( = 16 wu's/day * 7 days :)

sweet (aka 'Miss Piggy' LOL! :)
____________________________________________
http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/jbc33/