"sweet" <sweet430@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Hngqc.87226$Nn4.17489299@twister.nyc.rr.com...

"Seti Cruncher" <SetiCruncher@"NOSPAM"WildMail.com> wrote in message
news:cZbqc.11442$RM.8272@edtnps89...

I'm running two instances of SatH on a 3Gig Hyper-Threading machine.

After

SatH has been down so many times, I'm going to cache much more than

the

4

I

usually have.

Why don't they email all of us? This is not unreasonable b/c I know

when

hotmail (MS) has an announcement about some offer, it goes to all of

my

accounts... and they must have many more users than "just" 5 million.

Anyway, what's a good cache size? (I got plenty of space.) Say like

...

110?

( = 16 wu's/day * 7 days :)

sweet (aka 'Miss Piggy' LOL! :)
____________________________________________
http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/jbc33/

Sweet,

  I upped my own Cache from a 3 day WU cache to a 7 day WU cache just

over

a

month or so ago. Given the often unstability of the Seti Server I like

to

have a ready supply of WU just in case and I always restock the cache

when

they announce a outage just in case.

A 3 day cache was recommended but a 7 day cache works for me.

SC

thx! i wasnt sure if 110 was too large... but according to "John" holding

a

wu for more than 2 days doesnt go towards the science. and although i like
the numbers i am more interested in the science. so i guess ill wait till
the servers r up (which they r now)

I made it 20 b/c of the fact that wu's not returned within 2 days are no
longer considered part of the science.

sweet
http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/jbc33/