| Subject: Re: How smart are SETI@homers? |
| From: Joseph Lazio |
| Date: 19/05/2004, 00:26 |
| Newsgroups: sci.astro.seti,alt.sci.seti,sci.space.policy |
"R" == Rich <someone@somewhere.com> writes:
R> In infinite wisdom Joseph Lazio answered:
R> How much debt are you willing to leave to your children to search
R> for SETI?
Please compare the Government budgets (...) for the defense-related
activities to those for SETI-related activities.
R> The problem of govt by debt remains.
Agreed.
If you'd find it easier, you may simply use astronomy research in
place of SETI-related activities.
R> You don't seem to be able to identify the problem.
R> And your logic is along the lines of 'others are stealing the
R> public blind, so it's OK if we steal some too'. I doubt you see any
R> problems with your attitude either.
For the record, I'm a deficit hawk. However, I also know how to
appreciate the scale of the problem. Again, even simple arithmetic
serves to illustrate the basic problem. In fiscal year 2002, the US
Government spent about 10% of its budget or about $200G (billion) on
"physical, human, and community development," which includes a whole
slew of programs, of which astronomy is a small fraction. In that
fiscal year, the deficit was, coincidentally, about $200G. In this
fiscal year, the deficit is projected to be about $500G. In other
words, you can eliminate essentially all domestic discretionary
spending and you still can't balance the budget. The 1% or so that
goes to astronomy funding doesn't make a difference. It's like trying
to save pennies while throwing away tens of dollars.