| Subject: Re: Off Topic: Star Trek VOyager Home Coming Books. |
| From: raj@rijhwani.org (Raj Rijhwani) |
| Date: 19/05/2004, 17:03 |
On Tuesday, in article
<9krqc.88394$Nn4.17634177@twister.nyc.rr.com>
sweet430@hotmail.com "sweet" wrote:
In fact you have it backwards. All sci-fi has evolved from the latest know
theories. Black Holes, Wormholes, Time Travel, etc. were all possibilities
of the latest greatest physocs theory. I was a big fan of sci-fi at one
time. But pc has taken it over so that it has become soft, cuddly and oh
sooo puke-able(sp?). Today's sci-fi is nothing more than soap-oper in space.
P-freakin'-period-U.!)
Science is worth bugger all in abstract. Without humanity it means
nothing.
Besides that, no self-respecting scientist would spend time wondering if the
imaginings of an artsy type are true.
You mean artsy types like, oh, Robert L. Forward, or Isaac Asimov or
others?
I have several productive post-doctoral research scientists as friends, and
they would disagree with your assertion.
"All of nature is physics; everything else is stamp collecting." -Ernst
Rutherford
Rutherford was a specialist, and an obsessively focussed one at that. It
is easy to take a soundbite out of context. All of nature is indeed
governed by physics, but that is not its only value.