| Subject: Re: How to run with least amount of processes |
| From: Martin |
| Date: 17/06/2004, 18:50 |
Flwrite wrote:
Joe wrote:
I will run seti only when I don't use the computer.
I used to run SETI all the time.
But the complexity and resource usage of software has increased over the
years. Anti-virus program has gotten bigger, ZoneAlarm crashes if I sneeze,
and now there's a few new anti-spyware programs running in the background.
[...]
I open it in Mozilla, and it always looks better. Still using Outlook
Express for my Newsgroups, but even O.E. would be happier on a bigger
computer than Win98 and a 450 MHz PIII...)
Last year, I had to uninstall McAfee -- the bloat got too big -- even though
[...]
One day, I had to change my SETI-Driver to run at Low Priority, instead of
Normal. More and more often, I have to close SETI because my [win98]
resources or Free Memory are running low. Now, SETI is closed more than it
is open.
Been threatening to get away from "resource problems" by switching to WinXP.
Also, adding a router and a more modern computer or two. Grow a farm.
Maybe one day...
Maybe try one of the many linux distributions. No anti-virus required.
No spyware either. You get to choose whether or not to include 'bloat'.
There's even a linux distribution that runs s@h that all fits onto one
floppy disc!
Also note that computers are multitasking. I have a number of
'background' processes running, with minimal interference to normal tasks.
Have a look, you will likely be surprised at how responsive your
existing computer can be. A 450MHz machine should be plenty fast enough.
(And the cash you save can go towards extra RAM or a whole new machine (;-))
Have fun,
Martin