Gary Heston wrote:

In article <6ofkd05fhpgkq539nig6iv20am2pjjfu6a@4ax.com>, f/f george
<*> wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:39:24 -0000, gheston@hiwaay.net (Gary Heston)
wrote:

In article <6n5id016ibhm2lrt2jghr3bt9pjt1hht1i@4ax.com>, f/f george
<*> wrote:

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 03:48:59 GMT, "Seti Cruncher"
 [ ... ]   Of course if you still
have your original email from Berkeley you would have your password
and you could change the email to your current one....everyone DID
save those, RIGHT!!!

 [ ... ]

Berkeley didn't send out "original email" with S@h; participants had
to request it. Those who didn't (or did and didn't save it offline)
have frequently ended up unable to edit their accounts.

Here is the full sentence: "Of course if you still
have your original email from Berkeley you would have your password
and you could change the email to your current one....everyone DID
save those, RIGHT!!!"

Odd, that looks exactly like what I quoted above.

You can see that I said the same thing that you did just differently.

No, you said an "original email" was sent--S@h did not send any email
unless the participant went to their account information and
_requested_
that it be sent.

Or, if they installed and used SETISpy (or was it SETIDriver?) then an email
was automatically sent out when you requested your first unit. That could be
where the confusion lies.
--
~misfit~