Stratcat wrote:

"~misfit~" <misfit61nz@yahoo-mung.co.nz> wrote in message
news:9wJDc.4736$LT3.185735@news.xtra.co.nz...

AthlonRob wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:11:39 +0100, Ed <> wrote:

The "WUs" refer to future programs such as 8-bit S@H analysis,
broadband data analysis etc.  Kind of ironic to specify RAM without
CPU requirements, because my P II 233 has 768 MB RAM.  That
could mean my P II qualifies, whereas the latest P4 with less than
512 MB would not...

A Pentium 4 with 32MB of RAM wouldn't be able to run boinc/SAH,
though, wile a Pentium with 512MB of RAM would be able to run boinc.

If you don't have enough RAM, boinc really won't be able to run
without killing the system.  If your CPU is too slow, workunits will
just take a while to finish.

Windows Task Manager shows that BOINC is currently only using 5,440
K of RAM, a hell of a lot less than some things I have running and a
lot less than the CLI used (I think).
--
~misfit~

Hope I'm not killin' your b/w here, w/three posts in a row! = )

I believe we are still  running "a" SAH client under the BOINC
framework.

You should still see the usual 16 - 18M that SAH1 CLI_3.08 'used' to
take.

Doh! You're right, just checked again, 21,447 K for SAH, 4,853 K for Boinc
GUI (At present).
--
~misfit~