| Subject: Re: Code efficeincy? |
| From: AthlonRob |
| Date: 30/06/2004, 06:17 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:41:30 GMT, Stratcat <none@no.org> wrote:
IOW, you're saying the BOINC CLI_3.08 is not the same as the
'old' SAH1 CLI_3.08?
Exactly. We were running 3.07 in Beta for a while that had no relation
to the SAH1 CLI version.
They're different codebases, different software, tying in to different
systems.
I was hoping the CLI's were the same, just that they 'happen' to be running
under the BOINC environment. If I understand correctly, Doc Octopus managed
to 'swap' the CLI's while using BOINC, but I haven't gotten clarification on
this.
Nope, sorry... no such luck.
I can't imagine Doc Octopus managed to swap the old SAH1 CLI in there.
The workunit formats have even changed somewhat.
--
Rob | If not safe,
Email and Jabber: | one can never be free.
athlonrob at axpr dot net |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA4k1Khm6KEoOOAe0RAthVAKDi+oVpTR3zw54/Ul/XDYLUfN00gwCgu87+
WCEyMBoNnMGfTMTtpB86RfI=
=lb+v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----