Subject: Re: Code efficeincy?
From: AthlonRob
Date: 30/06/2004, 06:17
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:41:30 GMT, Stratcat <none@no.org> wrote:
IOW, you're saying the BOINC CLI_3.08 is not the same as the
'old' SAH1 CLI_3.08?

Exactly.  We were running 3.07 in Beta for a while that had no relation 
to the SAH1 CLI version.

They're different codebases, different software, tying in to different 
systems.

I was hoping the CLI's were the same, just that they 'happen' to be running
under the BOINC environment. If I understand correctly, Doc Octopus managed
to 'swap' the CLI's while using BOINC, but I haven't gotten clarification on
this.

Nope, sorry... no such luck.

I can't imagine Doc Octopus managed to swap the old SAH1 CLI in there.  
The workunit formats have even changed somewhat.

-- Rob | If not safe, Email and Jabber: | one can never be free. athlonrob at axpr dot net | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA4k1Khm6KEoOOAe0RAthVAKDi+oVpTR3zw54/Ul/XDYLUfN00gwCgu87+ WCEyMBoNnMGfTMTtpB86RfI= =lb+v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----