| Subject: Re: Code efficeincy? |
| From: "Stratcat" <none@no.org> |
| Date: 01/07/2004, 00:43 |
"AthlonRob" <junkmail@axpr.net> wrote in message
news:nditbc.di4.ln@dsl-gervais-88.web-ster.com...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:41:30 GMT, Stratcat <none@no.org> wrote:
IOW, you're saying the BOINC CLI_3.08 is not the same as the
'old' SAH1 CLI_3.08?
Exactly. We were running 3.07 in Beta for a while that had no relation
to the SAH1 CLI version.
They're different codebases, different software, tying in to different
systems.
I was hoping the CLI's were the same, just that they 'happen' to be
running
under the BOINC environment. If I understand correctly, Doc Octopus
managed
to 'swap' the CLI's while using BOINC, but I haven't gotten
clarification on
this.
Nope, sorry... no such luck.
I can't imagine Doc Octopus managed to swap the old SAH1 CLI in there.
The workunit formats have even changed somewhat.
Thx for your usual quick reply, and the heads up on #boinc. :-)
--
Strat