| Subject: Re: why is seti sooo slow on my machine.... |
| From: Alan Woodford |
| Date: 27/07/2004, 07:16 |
| Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti |
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:09:56 +0100 (BST), raj@rijhwani.org (Raj
Rijhwani) wrote:
On Monday, in article <t39Nc.169$uX4.157@trndny06>
brozewicz.rf@verizon.net "bob brozewicz" wrote:
it takes an average 8/9 hours.
Blimey! It only take around 4 hours on an Athlon 1900+, on Linux.
A 2.8 GHz Celeron should be leaving that in its dust.
Bets?
She who must be Obeyed's 2.4 Celery is about 50% slower than my
overclocked Thunderbird 1.4 running at 1.54, ~7 hours as opposed to
under 5 on sah1. The P IV HT 3.0 takes just under 3 hours, but does 2
at a time :-)
When I can find a file for my vast stock of tuits, the Celery will get
upgraded to the quickest P IV the m/b can handle - a 533fsb.
Alan Woodford
--
Men in Frocks, Protecting the Earth with mystical flummery!