"Seti Cruncher" <SetiCruncher@"NOSPAM"WildMail.com> wrote in message
news:HEZKc.48844$iw3.18111@clgrps13...

"JeffHetzel" <jeffhetzel@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040719201543.04802.00000074@mb-m12.aol.com...

Open question to anyone in the group.

A few days ago I downloaded McAfee to set up a firewall. Once it

was

installed

the SETI@Home program slowed to a snails pace. I turned McAfee off

and the

program was still slow so I uninstalled the McAfee and now SETI is

running

fine. Has anyone else experienced this and if you have is there a

workaround?

Jeff Hetzel


Superior minds discuss ideas
Average minds discuss events
Small minds discuss people

Adm. Hyman Rickover

Jeff,

What Version on Mcafee are you using?  I've heard similiar

complaints about

Mcafee 7.0 clashing with SETI@Home 3.08.

I've Run Mcafee 6.0 with both Seti@Home versions 3.03 and 3.08 for a

couple

years now without any problems or clashes.

I suspect that Mcafee 7.0 and SETI are sharing the same port, and

causing

said clash. Perhaps setting up a cacheing program and thus forcing

SETI to

use a port of your choice will fix this issue.  But I'm just

reaching here.

Hopely someone else on this forum will have a little more expertise.

Good Luck

I have been running Seti 3.08 on a Windows 98 machine for years. Last
week I installed broadband and yesterday I installed McAfee Firewall
Plus 5.0.5.7 (broadband suppliers suggested I need a firewall and I am
already using McAfee VirusScan and Spamkiller)
The effect was to slow Seti to a crawl.
Does anybody know if this can be cured by switching to BOINC?


-- 
Henry Goodman
henry dot goodman at virgin dot net