| Subject: Re: McAfee vs SETI@home version 3.08 |
| From: "Henry Goodman" <henry.goodman@virgin.net> |
| Date: 28/07/2004, 13:15 |
Well there were 4 days between installing broadband and installing the
firewall (though I did disconnect overnight) and Seti was fine during
that period (I was impressed by how fast it now downloads WUs). I
assume my problem is the same as the previous poster (JeffHetzel). I
don't see any unaccounted for traffic on the broadband link. Seti
equally slow when broadband disconnected.
--
Henry Goodman
henry dot goodman at virgin dot net
"Stelv"
<stelv@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:tY-dnUYLa8tE4ZrcRVn-jw@comcast.com...
Are you sure you didn't get zombieized between the time you
installed
broadband and the time you installed your firewall? It only takes a
few
unprotected seconds. Check your connection and see if there's a lot
of
suspicious up and down traffic.
Henry Goodman wrote:
"Seti Cruncher" <SetiCruncher@"NOSPAM"WildMail.com> wrote in
message
news:HEZKc.48844$iw3.18111@clgrps13...
"JeffHetzel" <jeffhetzel@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040719201543.04802.00000074@mb-m12.aol.com...
Open question to anyone in the group.
A few days ago I downloaded McAfee to set up a firewall. Once it
was
installed
the SETI@Home program slowed to a snails pace. I turned McAfee
off
and the
program was still slow so I uninstalled the McAfee and now SETI
is
running
fine. Has anyone else experienced this and if you have is there a
workaround?
Jeff Hetzel
Superior minds discuss ideas
Average minds discuss events
Small minds discuss people
Adm. Hyman Rickover
Jeff,
What Version on Mcafee are you using? I've heard similiar
complaints about
Mcafee 7.0 clashing with SETI@Home 3.08.
I've Run Mcafee 6.0 with both Seti@Home versions 3.03 and 3.08 for
a
couple
years now without any problems or clashes.
I suspect that Mcafee 7.0 and SETI are sharing the same port, and
causing
said clash. Perhaps setting up a cacheing program and thus forcing
SETI to
use a port of your choice will fix this issue. But I'm just
reaching here.
Hopely someone else on this forum will have a little more
expertise.
Good Luck
I have been running Seti 3.08 on a Windows 98 machine for years.
Last
week I installed broadband and yesterday I installed McAfee
Firewall
Plus 5.0.5.7 (broadband suppliers suggested I need a firewall and
I am
already using McAfee VirusScan and Spamkiller)
The effect was to slow Seti to a crawl.
Does anybody know if this can be cured by switching to BOINC?