Peter Hickman <peter@semantico.com> wrote in message news:

Are you using the command line code or the screensaver?

I'm using the application (not the screensaver version). I've checked
both the OS X Activity Monitor (the gui Terminal application) and
Terminal...both indicate I'm using up to 155% (ie, both processors)
for Seti. It appears that Ed is correct and that the compiler for the
Mac is not as efficient as the Intel one. :( Damn.

Thanks for the info people.