| Subject: Re: Please move distributed computing discussions to comp.distributed |
| From: Martin 53N 1W |
| Date: 03/08/2004, 03:37 |
| Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti |
Raj Rijhwani wrote:
On Monday, in article
<qSgPc.7956$N77.397992@news.xtra.co.nz>
misfit61nz@yahoo-mung.co.nz "~misfit~" wrote:
Raj Rijhwani wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:49:07 +1200, in article
<97BOc.7283$N77.377316@news.xtra.co.nz>
misfit61nz@yahoo-mung.co.nz "~misfit~" wrote:
Yes. However most interest in "SETI" in newsgroups is about the DC client.
Thus swamping any other discussion that the prior participants in the
newsgroup set it up to discuss. If one particular project comes to
dominate the discussion, any new initiatives are going to be stifled.
[...]
BOINC is the most significant thing happening at the moment. A lot of
posts on the subject is to be expected.
There is a question of categorisation... Should a DC project be
catagorised by the
_purpose_ of the project, or by the DC architechture
supporting it?
I'm sorry, but there's likely a lot more interest in whatever project as
a whole rather than the specific computer science supporting it.
I'll guess that you'll find BOINC comments and hints and tips spread
across the forums of many projects that commonly use BOINC support.
And just one post recently in c.distributed...
Any new 'grid' computing ideas anyone for over on c.d.?
Regards,
Martin