| Subject: Re: SETI Scientist Predicts ET Test |
| From: pooua@aol.com (Richard Alexander) |
| Date: 06/08/2004, 16:43 |
Mecallie <none@xx.cc> wrote in message news:<ceuars$pas$1@news3.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>...
spasmous wrote:
Uh, tell me how that goes again, you know P(x) >> P(y) without knowing
P(x) or P(y). Sounds like rationality stopped working here ;)
<SNIP>
And yet, you can tell me, without knowing any more variables than I do,
that there is no chance of ET life existing anywhere else?
I cannot speak for him, but in my case, I argue that there is no known
natural mechanism by which life would arise spontaneously. There are a
lot of theories, besides some nebulous claims of having created
"proto-cells" under "early Earth conditions," but nothing that
demonstrates actual abiogenesis, and the "proto-cells" turn out, under
closer examination, to be little more than soap bubbles.