| Subject: Re: xxxx_5 BOINC unit. |
| From: "Jon Kennedy" <jonkennedy@msn.com> |
| Date: 06/08/2004, 23:32 |
I have one unit in my cache with an _8. The rest are _0,_1,_2's.
--
Jon Kennedy
Charlotte, NC, USA
jonkennedy@msn.com
"~misfit~"
<misfit61nz@yahoo-mung.co.nz> wrote in message
news:hhFQc.9650$N77.461678@news.xtra.co.nz...
There must be a few WUs getting lost out there. You know how each unit is
sent out with a _0, _1 and a _2 suffix so that each unit is calculated
three
times and cross-checked? Recently I've noticed a few _3's and _4's and
today
I got a _5. Obviously a few results are being lost or not returned. My
understanding is that, if all three 'units' haven't been returned by the
expiry date they send out however many other copies are needed to get the
three results. A _5 must mean that all of the original three units were
lost.
Just thought I'd mention it. Anyone seen one higher than _5? Just curious.
--
~misfit~