"newsreader" <newsreader@charterinternet.net> wrote in message news:10h9jvd6mec9eae@corp.supernews.com...

"Richard Alexander" <pooua@aol.com> wrote in message
news:d8fbbe2d.0408060743.7070eb4f@posting.google.com...

I cannot speak for him, but in my case, I argue that there is no known
natural mechanism by which life would arise spontaneously. There are a
lot of theories, besides some nebulous claims of having created
"proto-cells" under "early Earth conditions," but nothing that
demonstrates actual abiogenesis, and the "proto-cells" turn out, under
closer examination, to be little more than soap bubbles.

OTOH...

I cannot speak for you, but in my case, I argue that there is no known
evidence by which life would arise by supernatural intervention. There are a
lot of theories, besides some nebulous claims of having created "from dust"
under "early Earth conditions," but nothing that demonstrates actual Divine
Creation, and the "historical records" turn out, under closer examination,
to be little more than tribal mythology.

I cannot speak for either of you, but in my case, I argue that you are both
talking about the same thing. You just give different words to it. Seriously.
Evolution and Creationism are the same. Life evolving is Divine.


Billiant postings though ! Thanks !
This makes the newsgroups worth reading.