| Subject: Berkeley conspiracies (Was: SETI@home message boards???) |
| From: Martin 53N 1W |
| Date: 07/09/2004, 01:19 |
~misfit~ wrote (lots!):
[...]
I know a lot of people are jumping to other projects because they're
dissapointed in SETI-BOINC.
Yes, some will be impatient or fickle and they will 'swap and change'
depending on which way the wind blows in their minds. (Still good for
whatever projects provided they complete the respective WUs.)
I'm sure most others will hang in 'for the long run'.
Myself, I'm letting other DC projects take advantage of my spare PC
resources until seti-boinc settles. Then I'll be reassigning the
priorities again according to my opinions and values.
<Puts conspiracy-theory hat on> Do you think that Berkeley could be
knobbling SETI-BOINC deliberately to serve up some users to other BOINC
projects? I know quite a few who have jumped ship, including a guy who
Phew!...
Note that extraordinary claims require following up with equally
extraordinary justifications...
In my opinion, the scientists at Berkeley are likely very happy for
their s@h followers to contribute to other DC projects, and especially
so for other Boinc projects.
An important idea behind Boinc is that Science beyond just s@h can
benefit from DC. True scientists will push all of science aswel as just
their own specialist subject. I think Berkeley are being very good in
the true (altruistic) scientific sense (for the good of ALL Mankind).
[...]
Hmmm, it all makes sense. Berkeley want a strangle-hold on distributed
computing and, to get other projects on board told them that they would
serve up a whole bunch of (irate) ex-SETI cruchers. They would 'leak' the
[...]
There is a world of difference between 'happen stance' and cold mean
premeditated 'intent'.
Berkeley took a reasoned gamble on their early release of seti-boinc.
The consequences have included disruption, and a little angst from a few
noisy self-righteous users. During this ensuing extended 'shake-down',
we have also seen some very rapid developments. We should have the
project up and robust far more quickly than if the beta-tests had
continued. We've also likely had Berkeley working through the night on this!
Another positive spin-off is that s@h's overwhelming user base has been
pushed into looking at other DC science projects.
There has been a theory around for quite a while that Berkeley is using our
computers for God-knows-what while pretending to be searching for aliens.
[...]
... Conspiracy, religion, pretence, all in one sentence... I'll let
Lloyd answer that one, Alleluia! (;-))
Hopefully, we'll all be willing to let our spare CPU cycles get used by
all manner of science projects beyond just s@h signal sniffing.
And hopefully the Open Source paradigm will ensure full openness in what
the code is really doing.
[...]
Ya know what? I'm gonna go back to classic until it's closed down and then
have a serious re-thing about this whole DC thing. After more than five
[...]
Your electricity is more precious than most for more than just spare
heating. (You're moving towards summer are you not? (:-))
Perhaps direct your CPU cycles to one or more of the other science
projects until seti-boinc robustly returns, or go offline for a while
and construct another crunch monster or few! (;-))
Good luck,
Martin