"~misfit~" <misfit61nz@yahoo-mungo.co.nz> wrote

I know a lot of people are jumping to other projects because they're
dissapointed in SETI-BOINC.

<Puts conspiracy-theory hat on> Do you think that Berkeley could be
knobbling SETI-BOINC deliberately to serve up some users to other BOINC
projects? I know quite a few who have jumped ship, including a guy who
crunched over 25,000 SETI classic units and has a 'farm', running seven 
PCs.
After all, BOINC is as much a Berkeley project as SETI and CPDN always
seemed to be a step ahead of SETI while not having the benefit of being at
Berkeley. Strange.

[....]

David Anderson was at Oxford for their open day and for some time afterward 
helping the CPDN developers setup CP-BOINC - CPDN didn't run properley under 
BOINC v3.xx, so they had to go to the next major revision - that's why CPDN 
was the first project to run BOINC v4.xx...

Ciao...

uk_nick...
-- 
Nick M V Salmon  Master Mariner  MN(Retd.)
Email: My four initials at dsl dot pipex dot com
http://www.nmvs.dsl.pipex.com/index.htm