Subject: Re: How are we defining Inteligence?
From: "Anthony Cerrato" <tcerrato@optonline.net>
Date: 17/09/2004, 15:43
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti,sci.astro.seti

"Matt Giwer" <jull43@tampabay.rr.RoMeVE.com> wrote in
message news:GZr2d.39070$uN5.3705@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
Linda wrote:
What's SETI looking for? Life forms able to communicate
with us? Life
intelligent enough to communicate with other similar
life forms? Life that
can communicate with my dog?
How are the various SETI projects defining what they are
searching for?

Unless one has the parochial idea that only Homo Sapiens
Sapiens (or
smarter) is "intelligent" then clearly the I in SETI is
not that.

In this case simply a non-natural source of RF in a narrow
frequency
range.

The assumption is something in the HSS range of
intelligence range is
required to be the cause of that non-natural source.
Intelligence
meaning outwitting the competition to survival.

So if humans all ascend like Daniel Jackson and spiders
evolve to
making RF mating calls of sufficient amplitude to be
detected at
interstellar distances that will also be non-natural in
the detection
sense of SETI.

The sci-fi idea of "Ascension" might explain why the ETIs
have left the field of action though, and thus also the
Fermi Paradox. I would not be surprised to see many alien
species using electromagnetic communication in the
universe--long-range com will always be limited though by
energy limitations and gas cloud/ atmospheric absorption. A
large number of species on Earth use EM for various reasons
but I haven't heard of any non-human DJs on the air
recently. :)               ...tonyC

-- 
What color is your terrorism wolf today?
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3228