| Subject: Re: Worst Average CPU time per work unit |
| From: "Zeljko Krolo" <zeljko@krolo.fsworld.co.uk> |
| Date: 27/09/2004, 19:27 |
"Martin 53N 1W" <ml_news@ddnospamddml1dd.co.uk.dd> wrote in message
news:GhX5d.784$W35.360@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
Nobody U Know wrote:
What is the record for the worst average cpu time per work unit?
I've got one going over 200 hours. Do I win the prize?
Nope, but a good try.
Why so slow for your example?
There are stories of some die-hard running s@h classic on an old 486DX
for over a year for ONE WU!
This must be FAQed somewhere...?
Happy crunchin',
Martin
--
---------- OS? What's that?!
- Martin - To most people, "Operating System" is unknown & strange.
- 53N 1W - Mandrake 10.0.1 GNU Linux - An OS for Supercomputers & PCs
---------- http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en-gb/concept.php3
I have several machines, processing WU's; 2 XP machines, 1 ME,
Win 98 and Win 95
On one of XP machines, average cpu time, per work unit is 7.04
hours, but on Win 95
estimated time left for WU is 3624 hours. Hopefully, it will be
ready for sending next
spring ! ?
Jacob
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.766 / Virus Database: 513 - Release Date: 9/17/2004