Subject: Re: Worst Average CPU time per work unit
From: "Zeljko Krolo" <zeljko@krolo.fsworld.co.uk>
Date: 27/09/2004, 19:27
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti

"Martin 53N 1W" <ml_news@ddnospamddml1dd.co.uk.dd> wrote in message
news:GhX5d.784$W35.360@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
Nobody U Know wrote:
What is the record for the worst average cpu time per work unit?

I've got one going over 200 hours.  Do I win the prize?

Nope, but a good try.

Why so slow for your example?


There are stories of some die-hard running s@h classic on an old 486DX
for over a year for ONE WU!

This must be FAQed somewhere...?


Happy crunchin',
Martin

-- 
----------   OS? What's that?!
- Martin -   To most people, "Operating System" is unknown & strange.
- 53N 1W -   Mandrake 10.0.1 GNU Linux - An OS for Supercomputers & PCs
----------   http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en-gb/concept.php3



   I  have  several  machines, processing  WU's;  2  XP  machines, 1 ME,
Win 98  and  Win 95
   On  one  of  XP  machines, average  cpu  time, per  work  unit  is  7.04
hours, but  on Win 95
  estimated  time  left  for  WU  is  3624  hours. Hopefully, it  will  be
ready  for  sending  next
  spring ! ?
                      Jacob


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.766 / Virus Database: 513 - Release Date: 9/17/2004