Mecallie wrote:

T. Spoon wrote:

Does anyone know of problems that may not have been reported via the server staus page?

[...]

not getting any WU's either. (Dual proc. pc blew up, darnet...)

They seem to be at it again with their "no comment" campaign. To bad, I thought they where learning.

[...]


From just one day ago:

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/
###
September 30, 2004
UPDATED: A new version (4.05) of the windows SETI@home client is available (and will be automatically picked up by your core clients next time you contact our servers). Changes include: the "heads up" mode now works and the progress bar advances in a more linear fashion.
Earlier today we released a similar version 4.04 which gave users checksum errors and failed to run. This has been fixed in 4.05.
###


From just now:

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_status.html

All running except the splitters.
###
Database status
State    Approximate #results
Ready to send    1,363,056
In progress    3,100,800
###

Which is no surprise. Crunch /that/ lot if you can!


And cricket:
http://cricket.berkeley.edu:8885/inr-668-interfaces.html

shows a very normal 60Mb/s.


All looks good. Have you updated to the latest Boinc?
Investigate further?


(BTW Mecallie, thanks for the bin usenet uploads (;-))

Good luck,
Martin