Subject: Re: Worst Average CPU time per work unit
From: "Louie" <louiethelizard@flies.hotmail.com>
Date: 01/10/2004, 03:23
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti

"Martin 53N 1W" <ml_news@ddnospamddml1dd.co.uk.dd> wrote in message
news:GhX5d.784$W35.360@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
Nobody U Know wrote:
What is the record for the worst average cpu time per work unit?

I've got one going over 200 hours.  Do I win the prize?

Nope, but a good try.

Why so slow for your example?


There are stories of some die-hard running s@h classic on an old 486DX
for over a year for ONE WU!

I believe that was me, Martin.  I did it more as an experiment than anything
else.  <bg>  BTW, that WU is *still* crunching!  Machine is a Packard Bell
Model PB1120 (420 Mobo), Intel 486DX\8Mhz (Turbo off), 0 L2 cache, 12MB RAM,
200MB HD running Win98SE.


This must be FAQed somewhere...?


Happy crunchin',
Martin

-- 
----------   OS? What's that?!
- Martin -   To most people, "Operating System" is unknown & strange.
- 53N 1W -   Mandrake 10.0.1 GNU Linux - An OS for Supercomputers & PCs
----------   http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en-gb/concept.php3
-- Louie Chiefland, FL, USA (eat the flies to email) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.768 / Virus Database: 515 - Release Date: 9/22/04