| Subject: Re: Worst Average CPU time per work unit |
| From: "~misfit~" <misfit61nz@hooya.co.nz> |
| Date: 01/10/2004, 11:59 |
Louie wrote:
"Martin 53N 1W" <ml_news@ddnospamddml1dd.co.uk.dd> wrote in message
news:GhX5d.784$W35.360@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
Nobody U Know wrote:
What is the record for the worst average cpu time per work unit?
I've got one going over 200 hours. Do I win the prize?
Nope, but a good try.
Why so slow for your example?
There are stories of some die-hard running s@h classic on an old
486DX for over a year for ONE WU!
I believe that was me, Martin. I did it more as an experiment than
anything else. <bg> BTW, that WU is *still* crunching! Machine is
a Packard Bell Model PB1120 (420 Mobo), Intel 486DX\8Mhz (Turbo off),
0 L2 cache, 12MB RAM, 200MB HD running Win98SE.
486DX *8*Mhz? I didn't know Intel made one. I take it it's an underclocked
faster chip?
--
~misfit~