| Subject: Re: Worst Average CPU time per work unit |
| From: "Louie" <louiethelizard@flies.hotmail.com> |
| Date: 01/10/2004, 18:06 |
"~misfit~" <misfit61nz@hooya.co.nz> wrote in message
news:2s4rggF1h7ibpU1@uni-berlin.de...
Louie wrote:
I believe that was me, Martin. I did it more as an experiment than
anything else. <bg> BTW, that WU is *still* crunching! Machine is
a Packard Bell Model PB1120 (420 Mobo), Intel 486DX\8Mhz (Turbo off),
0 L2 cache, 12MB RAM, 200MB HD running Win98SE.
486DX *8*Mhz? I didn't know Intel made one. I take it it's an underclocked
faster chip?
--
~misfit~
Exactly. It's *supposed* to run @ 25Mhz. With Turbo *on* it runs @ 16Mhz
so it's severely underclocked. I didn't bother changing jumpers as I wanted
to see how it ran *as is*.
--
Louie
Chiefland, FL, USA 29.30N 82.52W
(eat the flies to email)
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.768 / Virus Database: 515 - Release Date: 9/22/04