| Subject: Re: Worst Average CPU time per work unit |
| From: "~misfit~" <misfit61nz@hooya.co.nz> |
| Date: 01/10/2004, 23:55 |
Louie wrote:
"~misfit~" <misfit61nz@hooya.co.nz> wrote in message
news:2s4rggF1h7ibpU1@uni-berlin.de...
Louie wrote:
I believe that was me, Martin. I did it more as an experiment than
anything else. <bg> BTW, that WU is *still* crunching! Machine is
a Packard Bell Model PB1120 (420 Mobo), Intel 486DX\8Mhz (Turbo
off), 0 L2 cache, 12MB RAM, 200MB HD running Win98SE.
486DX *8*Mhz? I didn't know Intel made one. I take it it's an
underclocked faster chip?
--
~misfit~
Exactly. It's *supposed* to run @ 25Mhz. With Turbo *on* it runs @
16Mhz so it's severely underclocked. I didn't bother changing
jumpers as I wanted to see how it ran *as is*.
That is so, like, incomprehensible to a dyed-in-the-wool overclocker such as
myself. :-)
--
~misfit~