~misfit~ wrote:

John van Gorsel wrote:

[...]

Seems to be a general issue. Read in another newsgroup about an
overall processing time increase of about 75% when using Seti 4.05.
This is consistent with what I see on three pc's that are now running
4.05.

Ok, as long as it's more science and not just bad programming. I don't want
CPU cycles going to waste. CPN is looking more attractive.

It's also being discussed in some of the forum threads.

There's some good effort being put into an _optimised_ version to speed up the number crunching somewhat. Should be interesting to follow the progress.

And I'm experimenting with gcc at the moment. Shame I'm not on an AMD64...


Have fun,
Martin